Faculty Perceptions and Readership Patterns of Finance Journals: A Global View
基于全球862位金融学者的调查，发现顶级期刊排名高度一致，但其他期刊的质量认知受研究者地域、兴趣、资历和期刊关联影响。
Abstract Journal rankings are frequently used as a measure of both journal and author research quality. Nonetheless, debates frequently arise because journal rankings do not take into account the underlying diversity of the finance research community. This study examines how factors such as a researcher's geographic origin, research interests, seniority, and journal affiliation influence journal quality perceptions and readership patterns. Based on a worldwide sample of 862 finance academics, we find remarkable consistency in the rankings of top journals. For the remaining journals, perception of journal quality differs depending on the researcher's geographic origin, research interests, seniority, and journal affiliation.