🌙

欺骗与政治参与:理论与实验室证据

DECEPTION AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: THEORY AND LABORATORY EVIDENCE

Economic Inquiry · 2015
被引 6
人大 BABS 3

中文导读

研究在选民不确定候选人特质且广告可能欺骗时,选民如何投票;发现即使欺骗概率很小,选民也更可能选出低质量候选人。

Abstract

We model two‐candidate elections in which (1) voters are uncertain about candidates' attributes; and (2) candidates can inform voters of their attributes by sending advertisements. We compare between political campaigns with truthful advertising and campaigns in which there is a small chance of deceptive advertising. Our model predicts that voters should vote in‐line with an advertisement's information. We test our model's predictions using laboratory elections. We find, in the presence of even a small probability that an advertisement is deceptive, voters become substantially more likely to elect a “low‐quality” candidate. We discuss implications of this for existing models of voting decisions.

政治经济学实验经济学投票行为政治广告