Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review
由一位美国最高法院大法官撰写，通过三个他持异议的案例，探讨经济学在法律中的应用，涉及环保局是否考虑经济成本、转售价格维持的规则选择以及版权保护期延长问题。
This article considers the use of the economics in the law in the context of the US Supreme Court, of which the author is one of the Justices. It focuses on three cases where he has dissented, the first considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency may consider economic costs, the second whether a bright line rule or a rule of reason should apply to resale price maintenance and the third on whether copyright protection should be extended by a further 20 years. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009.