对Knittel和Smith的第二次回应

Second Response to Knittel and Smith

American Journal of Agricultural Economics · 2012
被引 0
人大 AABS 3

中文导读

回应Knittel和Smith的批评,指出其模型存在错误假设和内生性问题,修正后结果与原作者一致,并强调乙醇工厂关闭会严重影响汽油价格。

Abstract

Knittel and Smith present seven alternative versions of our model all of which apparently show a lower impact of ethanol production on gasoline prices. Four of these models are based on the flawed assumption that one can use the change in refiner’s margin and the change in gasoline prices interchangeably. The remaining three models all suffer from an obvious and endogeneity problem that when corrected results in results that are similar to ours. What is then left of their paper is a series of regressions of unrelated variables without appropriate controls, and with predictable results. I believe that the magnitude of all our results are reasonable and that they can be used in the current policy debate. Our results show that the closure of ethanol plants will have a serious impact on gasoline prices.

乙醇生产汽油价格内生性问题精炼商利润