Does well-being differ across customer value cocreation practice styles? An empirical study in a chronic health context
本研究基于慢性病患者的价值共创活动，识别出五种实践风格，并发现不同风格在身体、心理、存在和社交幸福感及满意度上存在差异，但无单一理想风格。
Purpose Drawing on an extensive range of activities across different types, including mandatory (customer), mandatory (customer or organisation), voluntary in-role and voluntary extra-role activities, this study aims to identify different health-care customer value cocreation practice styles based on the combinations of value cocreation activities they undertake and empirically examine how customers adopting different styles differ in terms of well-being and satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach The study was conducted across health customers with a variety of chronic conditions. Data were collected from three focus groups and an online survey. Findings Five customer practice styles, namely, the highly active, other-oriented, provider-oriented, self-oriented and passive compliant customers, were revealed. While a moderate to a high level of activities is often recommended as it is associated with higher levels of physical, psychological, existential and social well-being and customer satisfaction, the results also suggest there is no single ideal style as different styles may be associated with the same level of outcomes. Research limitations/implications As customers cocreate value differently, it is crucial to understand the underlying heterogeneity and its implications to outcomes. Practical implications Highly active and provider-oriented are the two styles that should be particularly encouraged because of their association with positive outcomes. Personalised strategies need to be developed and resources need to be put in place to build productive relationships amongst service providers, customers and peers and to increase the perceived value of such interactions so as to shift customers towards more active styles. Originality/value The study advances the understanding of customer value cocreation and its link to well-being by empirically deriving five distinct practice styles and demonstrating how they differ across meaningful well-being and satisfaction dimensions.