Having it all: can collaborative governance be both legitimate and accountable?
研究了协作治理安排中合法性与问责制共存的条件，基于案例数据库进行定性比较分析，发现两者在某些情况下可以同时实现，并提出了未来研究的命题。
Collaborative governance arrangements are frequently criticized for achieving collaboration at the expense of legitimacy and accountability. We explore the conditions under which legitimacy and accountability can occur in collaborative governance, ultimately aiming to discover whether collaborative arrangements can ‘have it all’, simultaneously being both legitimate and accountable. We leverage the Collaborative Governance Case Database to analyse a diversity of cases, employing a rich, qualitative comparative analysis. We find that legitimacy and accountability do co-exist in some cases and identify competing sets of conditions for this concurrence. Based on this exploration, we formulate propositions for future research.