Spreading Clio: a quantitative analysis of the first 25 years of theEuropean Review of Economic History
本文追踪了《欧洲经济史评论》头25年的发展，比较其初始目标与实际发表记录，并用引文数据衡量其成功，发现该期刊已成为欧洲大陆学者的主要发表渠道，但仍需努力缩小与更成熟期刊的差距。
Abstract This paper traces the history of the first 25 years of the European Economic History Review (EREH) comparing its initial agenda with its actual publication record and measuring its success with citation data. We rely on a database of all articles published in the EREH and in the four other top field journals from 1997 to 2020. The EREH has been a great success becoming, as planned at its establishment, the main outlet for continental European scholars and expanding somewhat its remit. Nonetheless, EREH needs to do an extra mile to fill the remaining gap with the more established field journals.