Iterative Coordination and Innovation: Prioritizing Value over Novelty
通过谷歌黑客马拉松的实地实验，研究发现迭代协调（如频繁会议）使企业更注重产品价值而非新颖性，导致产品更有价值但缺乏创新。
An innovating organization faces the challenge of how to prioritize distinct goals of novelty and value, both of which underlie innovation. Popular practitioner frameworks like Agile management suggest that organizations can adopt an iterative approach of frequent meetings to prioritize between these goals, a practice we refer to as iterative coordination. Despite iterative coordination’s widespread use in innovation management, its effects on novelty and value in innovation remain unknown. With the information technology firm Google, we embed a field experiment within a hackathon software development competition to identify the effect of iterative coordination on innovation. We find that iterative coordination causes firms to implicitly prioritize value in innovation: Although iteratively coordinating firms develop more valuable products, these products are simultaneously less novel. Furthermore, by tracking software code, we find that iteratively coordinating firms favor integration at the cost of knowledge-creating specialization. A follow-on laboratory study documents that increasing the frequency and opportunities to reprioritize goals in iterative coordination meetings reinforces value and integration, while reducing novelty and specialization. This article offers three key contributions: highlighting how processes to prioritize among multiple performance goals may implicitly favor certain outcomes; introducing a new empirical methodology of software code version tracking for measuring the innovation process; and leveraging the emergent phenomenon of hackathons to study new methods of organizing. History: This paper has been accepted for the Organization Science Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory. Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Google LLC, the Harvard Business School Division of Research and Faculty Development, and the National Science Foundation [Grant 1122374]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1499 .