Bridging divergent institutional logics through intermediation practices: Insights from a developing country context
研究了坦桑尼亚一个组织的中介实践如何通过促进学习、清晰化和综合来弥合森林部门利益相关者之间的制度逻辑分歧，从而减少运营低效并帮助减贫。
Poverty reduction is critical for global socio-political stability. In this paper we start from the observation that divergent institutional logics may indirectly uphold conditions of poverty. We focus on the intermediation practices of an organization working in Tanzania to deepen collaboration between forest sector stakeholders. Our findings show how operational inefficiencies in the forest sector perpetuate the deprivation of low-income populations and how increased intermediation can help to reduce such inefficiencies. We identify intermediation practices that create learning, clarity and synthesis and so help to overcome key differences between divergent institutional logics. The notion of intermediation practices helps not only to understand the work of intermediaries, but also to explain how operational environments need to be developed to achieve poverty reduction and sustainable development.