央行流动性应成为财政纪律的工具吗?

Should central bank liquidity be a vehicle for fiscal disciplining?

Cambridge Journal of Economics · 2022
被引 5
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

批评了Nyborg关于欧洲央行抵押品政策应强化成员国财政纪律的观点,认为这会加剧顺周期性和不稳定性,并提出了稳定市场型金融体系的抵押品政策核心原则。

Abstract

Abstract With notable exceptions, central banking scholars typically pay little attention to collateral frameworks, and therein, to the haircuts applied to the collateral assets pledged to access central bank liquidity. One such exception, Kjell Nyborg (2017) argues that the collateral policies adopted by the European Central Bank (ECB) aggravated the sovereign debt crisis and put the survival of the euro at risk. Drawing on the money view, we argue that Nyborg’s critique of the ECB’s crisis response is misguided and that his proposal to deepen and reinforce the ECBs role in the fiscal disciplining of member states via its collateral framework would be procyclical and destabilizing. We identify core principles for collateral policies suitable to stabilise market-based financial systems: (i) countercyclical haircuts, (ii) suspension of collateral valuation practices; and should these not be sufficient to abate collateral market liquidity strains, (iii) outright purchases of collateral assets.

中央银行流动性抵押品框架逆周期扣减率财政纪律