组织承诺前因的区分:March和Simon模型的检验

Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment: a test of March and Simon's model

JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR · 1998
被引 22
人大 AABS 4

中文导读

基于March和Simon框架,通过实地调查发现价值承诺和持续承诺的前因不同,组织任期、退休福利等与持续承诺更相关,而参与感、感知声望等与价值承诺更相关。

Abstract

Recent theory regarding the nature of organizational commitment suggests that viewing it as comprised of two dimensions, value commitment and continuance commitment, is of theoretical and practical value. This field study found the differential antecedents of these two commitment dimensions to be consistent with the March and Simon (1958) framework using the two-dimensional organizational commitment questionnaire from Mayer and Schoorman (1992). Organizational tenure, retirement benefits, education, and age were more highly correlated with continuance commitment, while felt participation, perceived prestige, job involvement, and role ambiguity were more highly correlated with value commitment. Analysis using LISREL 7 supported the pattern of relationships between the antecedents and the two commitment dimensions. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

组织行为人力资源管理心理学组织承诺