Emergence of organizational attributions: The role of a shared cognitive schema
探讨高层管理者个人认知能否通过共享认知图式汇聚为组织层面的解释，发现信息模糊性和偏见使共享图式不足以确保解释趋同，挑战了组织研究中个体认知与组织行动的直接关联。
Daft and Weick (1984) suggest that individual-level interpretations of top strategic managers can be expected to converge into an organizational interpretation because managers use identical cognitive schemata when making their personal interpretations. The primary purpose of this paper is to adapt the well-accepted interpersonal attribution schema to an organizational context to determine whether Daft and Weick's convergence argument is plausible. We conclude that the common phenomena of informational equivocality and bias make the existence of shared schemata a necessary but not sufficient condition for the convergence of interpretations. Therefore, studies in the organizational literature which rely on the convergence argument fail to sufficiently establish a linkage between individual cognition and organizational action.