Referee Recommendations
定量分析了八家顶级经济金融期刊和SFS Cavalcade会议中审稿人的推荐行为，发现审稿人个体差异对推荐结果的影响是共同因素的两倍。
This paper quantitatively analyzes referee recommendations at eight prominent economics and finance journals, and the SFS (Society for Financial Studies) Cavalcade Conference, where a known algorithm matched referees to submissions. The behavior of referees was similar in all venues. The referee-specific component in the disposition recommendation was about twice as important as the common component. Referees differed both in their scales (some referees were intrinsically more generous than others) and in their opinions of what a good paper was (they often disagreed about the relative ordering of papers).