A Critique of Social Contracts for Business
评估了唐纳森、邓菲和基利三位教授的社会契约理论，用道德权威、道德心理学和管理效用检验其优缺点，指出理论发展仍有大量工作。
This article evaluates the social contract theorizing of Professors Thomas Donaldson, Thomas Dunfee and Michael Keeley. This theorizing is tested with G.E. Moore’s concept of moral authority, with moral psychology, and by managerial utility. Both strengths and weaknesses are found in the theories and the author concludes that while there is great potential, much work in theory development remains.