Bargaining in an Asymmetrical Power Structure
通过博弈实验比较了不对称与平衡权力结构下的讨价还价过程与结果，发现不对称条件下效率更高但协议更不可预测，部分弱势成员未能获得资源。
This study utilized a gaming experiment to compare the bargaining processes and outcomes in an asymmetrical power structure against those of a more balanced setting. Bargaining in the unbalanced condition was more “efficient,” but terms of agreement were much less predictable, and some weak members failed to obtain valued resources.