Framing the Allais paradox as a daily farm decision problem: tests and explanations
将阿莱悖论重新表述为农场日常决策问题，发现仅26%的农民违反期望效用假说，且违规倾向随教育、经验和家庭规模增加而降低，考虑选择错误后违规率统计上不显著。
Abstract The well‐known Allais paradox is reformulated as a daily farm decision problem. Only 26% of the farmers exhibit violations of the expected utility hypothesis. Moreover, the tendency for violation decreases with the farm operator's education, experience and family size. No effects of the farm main crop or its scale were detected. Finally, when taking into account the possibility of choice errors, we find that the violation rate is statistically insignificant.