Two logics of democracy in collaborative governance: a mapping of clashes and compromises
本文梳理了协作治理中问责与合法性的多种概念、类型和批评，发现它们由两种民主逻辑（选举逻辑和利益相关者逻辑）所结构，并首次将这些内容整合在一张图谱中。
Collaborative governance is a promising supplement to traditional Weberian bureaucracy and New Public Management. However, the legitimacy and accountability of collaborative governance processes and outcomes is questionable. Based on a comprehensive mapping of the scholarly literature, we show that the sweeping multiplicity of accountability and legitimacy conceptions, types and critiques is structured by two democratic logics: an electoral one revolving around the territorial state and a stakeholder one focused on the collaborative network. The article provides the first attempt to position the conceptions, types and critiques of the accountability and legitimacy of collaborative governance in one map.