比较两种早期儿童健康干预的长期教育效果

Comparing long-term educational effects of two early childhood health interventions

Journal of Health Economics · 2022
被引 2
人大 AABS 3

中文导读

比较了传统护理和袋鼠妈妈护理两种早产儿干预方案对儿童长期教育成果的影响,发现袋鼠妈妈护理增加了学前出勤、减少了短期缺课,但对高中毕业和语言成绩无显著差异。

Abstract

We compare the educational effects of two medical protocols that mitigate long-term consequences of prematurity or low birth weight. The two protocols are Traditional Care (TC), which uses incubators, and Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) which replaces incubators for 24-hour skin-to-skin contact between newborns and caregivers. We concentrate on educational outcomes addressing contradictory results in previous contributions. We use a randomized controlled trial implemented in 1993 that randomly assigned children to either TC or KMC. OLS results suggest that KMC children spent more time in preschool, had fewer temporary school absences, and showed lower math test scores. Both groups observed similar effects on high-school graduation and language test scores. We correct for attrition, small sample, and multiple outcomes. Effects on preschool attendance and school absenteeism are robust, particularly for more vulnerable infants (birth weight ≤ 1,800 g). The other effects lose statistical significance due to multiple outcome testing or attrition corrections.

早产儿护理方案袋鼠式护理学前教育出勤率学校缺勤率