Returns to scale, spillovers and persistence: A network perspective of U.S. bank size
将射线规模经济和扩展路径规模经济方法扩展到动态空间设定，应用于美国大型银行，发现考虑溢出和动态后扩展路径规模经济更优，且其效应具有强持续性，对监管规模上限设定有启示。
Abstract The methods for ray‐scale economies (RSE) and expansion‐path scale economies (EPSE) are extended to the dynamic spatial setting. We apply these methods to large U.S. banks using dynamic spatial cost and revenue models and key findings include the following. First, accounting for spillovers and dynamics strengthens the case for EPSE over RSE. Second, own, spillover and total EPSE are very persistent in future periods. Third, the EPSE suggest that an appropriate regulatory size cap would shift one systemically important bank to its contemporaneous optimal scale. However, the EPSE suggest that this would be a sub‐optimal dynamic scale in future periods.