A miracle of measurement or accidental constructivism? How PLS subverts the realist search for truth
本文从哲学基础出发，检验偏最小二乘路径建模（PLS）是否适合科学实在论者使用，发现PLS与建构主义一致而与实在论相悖，对方法论选择有启示。
Purpose This study aims to determine whether partial least squares path modeling (PLS) is fit for purpose for scholars holding scientific realist views. Design/methodology/approach The authors present the philosophical foundations of scientific realism and constructivism and examine the extent to which PLS aligns with them. Findings PLS does not align with scientific realism but aligns well with constructivism. Research limitations/implications Research is needed to assess PLS’s fit with instrumentalism and pragmatism. Practical implications PLS has no utility as a realist scientific tool but may be of interest to constructivists. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to assess PLS’s alignments and mismatches with constructivist and scientific realist perspectives.