Information transmission in voluntary disclosure games
研究在自愿披露博弈中，信息更充分的发送者是否传递更准确的信息，发现与一般战略沟通环境不同，答案是肯定的，且接收者效用随证据信息量增加而提高。
Does a better-informed sender transmit more accurate information in equilibrium? We show that, in a general class of voluntary disclosure games, unlike other strategic communication environments, the answer is positive. If the sender's evidence is more Blackwell informative, then the receiver's equilibrium utility increases. We apply our main result to show that an uninformed sender who chooses a test from a Blackwell-ordered set does so efficiently.