Is critique sustainable? A commentary on Bigoni and Mohammed
本文反思了Bigoni和Mohammed文章引发的反应，指出批判会计领域必须认真对待若干张力，并倡导建立分析/议程双重框架，以弱势群体为中心，推动社会与环境问题的解决。
Reflecting on the reactions that Bigoni and Mohammed's article “Criticism is unsustainable: A polemic” has provoked in me, I describe in this essay a number of tensions in the field of critical accounting that I sincerely believe must be taken seriously if critical accounting research is to fulfil its emancipatory potential. I also advocate the establishment of a dual analytical/programmatic agenda in the field of critical accounting that enables academic contributions to support the necessary social transformations. This agenda must put the disadvantaged (human and non-human, present and future) at the centre of our research and it should be centred around the co-creation of programmes that allow us to clearly link our academic contributions to the resolution of the social and environmental problems analysed.