What’s up with our obsession with the theoretical contribution: A means to an end or an end in and of itself?
反思了管理与组织研究领域对理论贡献的过度痴迷，分析了其通过三种机制对知识生产造成的有害后果，包括理论概念不必要激增、理论脱离实证验证以及为理论而理论。
Knowledge production in the discipline of management and organization studies (MOS) is in a labyrinth of its own making. Over the last 30 years, scholars in the discipline have exhibited an intransigent obsession with the theoretical contribution. At this juncture, with Organization about to commence its fourth decade in publication, I would like to take the opportunity to pause as well as to reflect on some of the implications and the consequences that emanate from this obsession. Drawing on specific examples from MOS, I focus my analysis on three mechanisms through which the discipline’s obsession with the theoretical contribution poses unintended but detrimental outcomes on knowledge production: (1) unnecessary proliferation of theoretical constructs, (2) building theory upon theory rather than empirical validation, and (3) making theory for theory’s sake.