Do rating agencies impound workforce human capital information into default risk assessments?
研究利用韩国上市公司数据，发现员工任期（人力资本代理指标）与信用评级正相关，表明评级机构认为员工留任能降低违约风险，对非四大审计和中小企业影响更显著。
No accounting policy exists to mandate that employee-level human capital (ELHC) must be included on Annual Reports. Because structured ELHC information is rare, the association between ELHC and credit ratings (risk) is not demonstrated in the extant literature. South Korea is a unique instance where ELHC information is included on Annual Reports as a rule. Using a sample of 9,273 Korean listed firm-year observations from 2011-2020, we demonstrate that employee tenure, a ELHC proxy, has a positive association with credit ratings. The results infer that credit rating agencies interpret that employee tenure improves a firm's potential to survive a business cycle. The study also demonstrates that continuous employment has a more positive effect on credit ratings for NonBig4 and smaller clients/firms, compared to Big4 and larger clients/firms. The study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that firms that retain employees are less likely to default, implying that if firms look after employees, there are economic advantages. From a policymaking perspective, the study demonstrates the information advantage of reporting non-financial ELHC information on Annual Reports, on a structured/numerical basis.