Revise and resubmit? Peer reviewing business historical research
这篇社论回顾了《商业史》期刊的同行评审流程，讨论了双盲评审的挑战，并为评审者提供了针对商业历史研究的实用指南，适合关注学术评审的学者阅读。
Introduction. Peer review in Business History has benefitted from the insights of over 550 expert reviewers over the past three years. In this editorial, we contextualise the journal’s peer review process historically and in the available literature. We discuss some of the challenges of the double-blind review system, including securing reviewer engagement amidst time constraints and publication pressure, the dark sides of anonymisation, and the role of bias, values, and interdisciplinarity in research evaluations. Based on these reflections, we furnish some concrete guidance for reviewers on how to approach business historical research. We end by contemplating the future landscape of peer review and opening a conversation about review standards and reviewer education in the field of business history. Is peer review ripe for revision and resubmit?