重新安置国是否影响难民劳动力市场边缘化的风险?瑞典和挪威的队列研究

Does country of resettlement influence the risk of labor market marginalization among refugees? A cohort study in Sweden and Norway

Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · 2024
被引 1
ABS 3

中文导读

本研究比较了瑞典和挪威难民与本地居民在长期失业、长期病假和残疾养老金方面的风险差异,发现难民风险更高,且风险因出生国和居留时间而异,提示非结构性因素可能比东道国结构因素更重要。

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the risk of labor market marginalization among refugees across different host countries of resettlement and examine the moderating role of birth country and length of stay on these associations. METHODS: Cohorts of refugees and native-born individuals aged 19–60 in Sweden (N=3 605 949, 3.5% refugees) and Norway (N=1 784 861, 1.7% refugees) were followed during 2010–2016. Rates (per 1000 person-years) of long-term unemployment, long-term sickness absence, and disability pension were estimated for refugees and the host populations. Cox regression models estimated crude and adjusted (for sex, age, educational level, and civil status) hazard ratio (HR adj ) for refugees compared to their respective host population, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses were also stratified by birth country and length of stay. RESULTS: Refugees in Norway and Sweden had a higher incidence of labor market marginalization compared to their host population. Refugees in Sweden had a comparatively lower relative risk of long-term unemployment but higher risk of disability pension (HR adj 3.44, 95% CI, 3.38–3.50 and HR adj 2.45, 2.35–2.56, respectively) than refugees in Norway (HR adj 3.70, 3.58–3.82 and HR adj 1.57, 1.49–1.66, respectively). These relative risks varied when stratifying by birth country. A shorter length of stay was associated with a higher risk of long-term unemployment and a lower risk of disability pension, with a stronger gradient in Sweden than in Norway. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of labor market marginalization varied by the refugees’ birth country but followed similar trends in Sweden and Norway. Although speculative, these findings may hint at non-structural factors related to the refugee experience playing a more important role than host country structural factors for the risk of labor market marginalization among refugees. Future research, including host countries with more variability in structural factors, is required to further investigate these associations. The higher risk of long-term unemployment among refugees with shorter length of stay indicates a need for more efficient labor market integration policies for newly-arrived refugees.

难民研究劳动力市场移民经济学公共卫生社会政策