Reframing Informal Institutional Voids as the Attempted Remaking of Contested Social Spaces: Evidence from England
本研究重新定义非正式制度空白为制度重塑的争夺空间，基于123个访谈数据，揭示通过发展新规范、设计合法政治干预和协商新规则三种活动，挑战了传统空白文献的假设，对健康与城市发展领域有启示。
The conventional perspective on institutional voids as mere absences has recently faced criticism. Recent research suggests that voids are instead sites of contestation between institutions. However, understanding the specifics of this and how informal voids function in such contestations requires deeper investigation. We combine insights from the institutional voids and political theory literatures to reconceptualise informal voids as spaces of attempted institutional remaking which occurs through three key activities - developing new norms, devising legitimate political interventions and negotiating new rules. We present data from 123 interviews to demonstrate these three activities. This evidence enables us to challenge two assumptions in the voids literature and to demonstrate how an informal void (as reconceptualised) functions at the nexus of health and urban development in England. This study has implications for investigating informal voids as active social spaces, where actors attempt to remake contested social spaces through three core types of activity.