Iterated Admissibility does not Refine Extensive-form Rationalizability
证明在扩展式博弈中，迭代可接受性（即迭代消除弱占优策略）得到的结果不一定与扩展式理性化一致。
Abstract I show that, in an extensive-form game, the outcomes that are consistent with iterated admissibility (i.e., with the iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies) need not be consistent with extensive-form rationalizability.