沃德罗普均衡可以是有限理性的:一种新的路径选择行为理论

Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice

Transportation Science · 2024
被引 10
ABS 3

中文导读

本文证明有限理性的出行者通过逐日调整路径估值,最终仍能收敛到沃德罗普均衡,提出了累积Logit模型,仅用两个参数描述路径选择行为,为交通系统分析提供了更坚实的微观基础。

Abstract

As one of the most fundamental concepts in transportation science, Wardrop equilibrium (WE) has always had a relatively weak behavioral underpinning. To strengthen this foundation, one must reckon with bounded rationality in human decision-making processes, such as the lack of accurate information, limited computing power, and suboptimal choices. This retreat from behavioral perfectionism in the literature, however, was typically accompanied by a conceptual modification of WE. Here, we show that giving up perfect rationality need not force a departure from WE. On the contrary, WE can be reached with global stability in a routing game played by boundedly rational travelers. We achieve this result by developing a day-to-day (DTD) dynamical model that mimics how travelers gradually adjust their route valuations, hence choice probabilities, based on past experiences. Our model, called cumulative logit (CumLog), resembles the classical DTD models but makes a crucial change; whereas the classical models assume that routes are valued based on the cost averaged over historical data, our model values the routes based on the cost accumulated. To describe route choice behaviors, the CumLog model only uses two parameters, one accounting for the rate at which the future route cost is discounted in the valuation relative to the past ones and the other describing the sensitivity of route choice probabilities to valuation differences. We prove that the CumLog model always converges to WE, regardless of the initial point, as long as the behavioral parameters satisfy certain mild conditions. Our theory thus upholds WE’s role as a benchmark in transportation systems analysis. It also explains why equally good routes at equilibrium may be selected with different probabilities, which solves the instability problem posed by Harsanyi. Funding: This research is funded by the National Science Foundation [Grants CMMI #2225087 and ECCS #2048075]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0132 .

交通科学行为经济学路径选择有限理性博弈论