Efficacy of continuous passive motion compared to physiotherapy in rehabilitation after total knee replacement: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
该研究比较了持续被动运动与团体物理治疗在全膝关节置换术后住院康复中的效果，发现两者在功能评分、关节活动度和疼痛管理方面无显著差异，表明持续被动运动可作为传统物理治疗的补充。
Successful total knee replacement (TKR) heavily depends on postoperative rehabilitation. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of continuous passive motion (CPM) partially replacing group physiotherapy in an inpatient rehabilitation setting in order to contribute to the lack of physiotherapists in patients' care. Adult patients after TKR were included. A prospective randomized controlled two-center trial was conducted across inpatient rehabilitation facilities in Germany. Participants were randomly assigned to CPM or group physiotherapy. In addition, all participants received the same standard rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was the Staffelstein Score, and secondary outcome measures included Oxford Knee Score, range of motion (ROM), pain, and return to work. Non-inferiority margin for Staffelstein Score was set at ±5% of maximum scores based on previous collected data. Results indicate no significant differences between CPM and physiotherapy groups in the Staffelstein Score (CPM: 94 ± 10 points; group physiotherapy: 92 ± 10 points; P > 0.05), ROM, or pain management at discharge from rehabilitation facility. This study underscores the potential of CPM as a valuable component of TKR rehabilitation, providing comparable outcomes to traditional physiotherapy. However, individualized physiotherapy remains integral to optimizing long-term success. Future research should explore extended follow-up periods and diverse patient populations to further elucidate CPM's role in TKR rehabilitation.