A Commentary on Santuzzi et al. (2024): Impact of Response Options on Formal Disclosure Rates for Disabilities in Organizations
这篇评论概述了Santuzzi等人关于响应选项如何影响组织中残疾正式披露率的研究，指出残疾识别缺乏标准指标，并建议未来研究AMO框架和资产模型，以及神经多样性在工作场所的披露影响。
The following commentary offered an overview of the article “Impact of Response Options on Formal Disclosure Rates for Disabilities in Organizations”, noting that the authors identified several workplace opportunities for inclusion related to disabled workers, yet more remains to be explored. Namely, there is no standard metric for disability identification. As noted in other current works, individuals choose to identify or not as disabled, based on their definition or experiences of opportunity and challenge as related to their “disability”. The commentary identified the AMO framework and asset model as areas still to be studied as they relate to self-reporting of disability in the workplace. Additionally, the article inspires further conversation regarding neuroatypicality in the workplace and how the broad population of diagnosed and undiagnosed neurodivergent individuals are also influenced by disclosure in the workplace.