On the Value of Risk-Averse Multistage Stochastic Programming in Capacity Planning
研究了在不确定需求下，风险厌恶型多阶段随机整数规划与两阶段方法在产能规划中的成本差距，推导了理论边界并提出了近似算法，为决策者选择模型提供了指导。
We consider a risk-averse stochastic capacity planning problem under uncertain demand in each period. Using a scenario tree representation of the uncertainty, we formulate a multistage stochastic integer program to adjust the capacity expansion plan dynamically as more information on the uncertainty is revealed. Specifically, in each stage, a decision maker optimizes capacity acquisition and resource allocation to minimize certain risk measures of maintenance and operational cost. We compare it with a two-stage approach that determines the capacity acquisition for all the periods up front. Using expected conditional risk measures, we derive a tight lower bound and an upper bound for the gaps between the optimal objective values of risk-averse multistage models and their two-stage counterparts. Based on these derived bounds, we present general guidelines on when to solve risk-averse two-stage or multistage models. Furthermore, we propose approximation algorithms to solve the two models more efficiently, which are asymptotically optimal under an expanding market assumption. We conduct numerical studies using randomly generated and real-world instances with diverse sizes, to demonstrate the tightness of the analytical bounds and efficacy of the approximation algorithms. We find that the gaps between risk-averse multistage and two-stage models increase as the variability of the uncertain parameters increases and decrease as the decision maker becomes more risk averse. Moreover, a stagewise-dependent scenario tree attains much higher gaps than a stagewise-independent counterpart, whereas the latter produces tighter analytical bounds. History: Accepted by Andrea Lodi, Area Editor for Design & Analysis of Algorithms–Discrete. Funding: This work of Dr. X. Yu was partially supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Division of Information and Intelligent Systems [Grant 2331782]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0396 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0396 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .