Calculative Practices Shaping the Global Accountability Forum for Climate Agenda
本文研究了围绕年度气候治理辩论的计算实践如何产生预期效果和反效果，例如社会排斥和利益相关者的批评，基于联合国缔约方会议之间的文件分析。
ABSTRACT Calculative practices are everywhere, including the enactment and diffusion of sustainable development goals, such as quantifying and monetizing carbon markets, criteria for allocating donations for sustainability programs, and performance measurement of compromises and goals. We critically explore the performativity and counter‐performativity from the calculative practices orbiting and shaping the annual debate on climate governance and how they are related to the vulnerability of populations. Our qualitative analysis comprised a comprehensive set of documents produced by enrolled participants of meetings and workshops between two annual Conferences of the Parties of the United Nations. We identified and exemplified three calculative practices, and despite their intended performativity, some counter‐effects, like social exclusion and criticism by stakeholders, arise.