Being good and doing good in behavioral policymaking
本文探讨行为政策制定中自由意志家长主义面临的批评，并引入凯恩斯社会哲学，为政策制定提供更结构化和财政干预的视角。
Abstract Libertarian paternalism (LP) draws on behavioral economics to advocate for noncoercive, nonfiscal policy interventions to improve individual well‐being. However, growing criticism is encouraging behavioral policymaking—long dominated by LP approaches—to consider more structural and fiscally impactful interventions as valid responses to behavioral findings. Keynesian social philosophy allows behavioral policymaking to incorporate these new perspectives alongside existing LP approaches.