Variations in innovation strategies for sustainable development: Sustainable innovation policy instrument mixes of ten small OECD countries across five sectors
研究了10个小型OECD国家在农业、水、健康、能源和制造业五个部门的1722项可持续创新政策干预措施，发现北欧国家侧重政府研发资助和市场创造，而以色列、新西兰和瑞士则分别侧重企业创新工具和有利环境建设。
Innovation plays an inevitable role in transforming our current modes of production and consumption towards sustainable development. Yet it is unclear what strategies and policy instruments different governments have been using to support innovation for sustainable development. To address these gaps, we provide the first comprehensive multi-sectoral (agriculture, water, health, energy, and manufacturing) and multi-country (10 smaller developed and innovative countries) analysis. We synthesized a novel dataset of 1722 sustainable innovation policy interventions (2008–2020) and used correspondence analysis to identify the different government strategies. The strategy characteristic of the Nordic countries with high government R&D spending and mostly coordinated market economies tends to support targeted R&D funding and market creation (e.g., public private partnerships, international technology transfer, demonstration projects). This is in contrast with the strategies of Israel and New Zealand focusing on firm innovation through direct economic tools (e.g., incubators, venture capital support) and Switzerland creating an enabling environment for innovation (e.g., clusters, networks, science & technology parks, basic research, public research centers, regulations), all three countries being characteristic of liberal market economies. The empirical data also revealed that there are three policy areas that are relatively underrepresented that merit additional research as potentially hindering sustainable innovation. • Addresses a lack of cross-national and -sectoral analyses of sustainable innovation policies • Presents a country-level typology of sustainable innovation policy strategies for 10 small OECD countries • Sustainable innovation policies in these countries still heavily focus on supply side • Lack of support for production and scale-up of sustainable technologies • Correspondence analysis as a useful tool for comparative analysis of policy mixes