衡量虚假报告的动机与严重程度

Measuring Misreporting Incentives and Severity

Management Science · 2025
被引 1
人大 A+FT50UTD24ABS 4*

中文导读

基于虚假报告动机提出三种类型(高管财富追求、资本市场压力、下属管理不善),构建衡量指标和综合严重程度评分,用于研究虚假报告的原因和后果。

Abstract

We propose an empirical measure of the types of financial misreporting based on misreporting incentives. We identify three distinct types: (1) misreporting driven by top executives’ wealth pursuits, (2) misreporting induced by capital market pressure, and (3) misreporting by subordinates due to inadequate management oversight. Our measure is developed by conducting a detailed analysis of the textual data from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. We also provide rigorous empirical validations. Additionally, we create a composite misreporting severity score that incorporates the three misreporting incentives. Using our measure of misreporting incentives, we help reconcile previous mixed findings on the link between equity incentives and financial misreporting. Furthermore, in predicting market reactions to misreporting, our misreporting severity score outperforms a measurement that does not integrate misreporting incentives. Our measures can be practical tools for investigating a wide range of research questions related to the causes and consequences of financial misreporting. This paper was accepted by Ranjani Krishnan, accounting. Funding: This work was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 [Grants RG101/22 and RG59/17]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00160 .

财务错报动机错报严重程度错报类型错报市场反应