Limiting Prices or Transferring Money? An ex ante assessment of alternative measures to cope with the hike in energy prices
事前评估了德国、荷兰和奥地利2023年能源价格上限政策对家庭支出的缓冲效果，发现该政策只能部分吸收通胀对低收入家庭的不利影响，但能完全消除能源贫困的增加。
The hike in energy prices across Europe in 2022 and 2023 led to significant government interventions. Several governments introduced ‘energy price cap’ measures to alleviate the increased burden on households’ expenditures. This paper presents an ex ante assessment of the expected distributional impact of the inflation surge and the cushioning effect of these price cap policies introduced in 2023 in Germany, the Netherlands and Austria. Our analysis combines macroforecasting techniques with microsimulation methods and shows that the inflationary shock of 2023 will more severely affect those households at the bottom of the income distribution. Our results also highlight that the price cap measures will only partly absorb the negative distributional consequences of the inflationary shock while it would completely offset the increase in energy poverty. Additionally, we show that simpler measures, such as lump-sum cash transfers, are more efficient (considering government’s budgetary costs) in cushioning the inequality-increasing effects of inflation, especially when such measures are targeted. Price caps, on the other hand, are more efficient in reducing energy poverty, given the non-negligible incidence of energy poverty in middle-income groups. • Rising energy prices hit low-income households hardest due to spending patterns. • Price caps absorb only partly the regressivity of the inflationary shock. • Targeted lump-sum benefits reduce inequality better than untargeted measures. • Price caps ease energy poverty but risk distorting markets and climate goals. • Lump-sum benefits are cost-efficient but need strong data systems for targeting.