Socially responsible investing: a fair-weather commitment
研究了2014至2024年间社会责任基金与传统指数在不同市场条件下的关系，发现市场动荡时两者表现趋同，表明社会责任投资在危机中失去吸引力。
Abstract Socially responsible investing (SRI) has gained significant popularity, with investors and institutions increasingly prioritizing sustainability and ethical considerations. However, during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, investor preferences often shift toward conventional assets, raising the question of whether SRI is a true priority or a luxury for stable markets. This paper investigates the relationship between socially responsible funds (SRFs) and conventional indices (CIs) across different market conditions, assessing whether SRFs maintain their appeal during financial distress. Using data from 2014 to 2024, we identify two volatility regimes via a Hidden Markov model and exploit copula models to assess tail dependence, cointegration tests to examine long-term price relationships, fuzzy clustering to classify assets by risk dynamics, and spillover analysis to measure asset interconnectedness. Our findings show that SRF and CI performance converge in performance during market turmoil, suggesting that SRI loses prominence in unstable conditions. Moreover, systemic, geographic, and issuer-specific risks overshadow ESG-related factors, challenging the notion of SRI as a resilient investment strategy in turbulent markets.