The effectiveness of functional and affective recovery strategies in restoring user trust after privacy violations: the moderating role of violation type
通过在线实验发现，功能性恢复策略比情感性策略更能修复用户信任，且恢复满意度起中介作用；对于意外隐私侵犯，功能性修复更有效，而故意侵犯下两种策略效果无显著差异。
Purpose This study investigates the impact of organizational recovery strategies on user trust repair following an information privacy violation incident as well as the mediating mechanism and boundary condition. Design/methodology/approach We conducted an online scenario-based experiment employing a 2 (recovery strategies: functional vs affective) × 2 (privacy violation type: intentional vs accidental) between-subjects design. The experiment was conducted in China using 290 randomly selected platform users. Findings The functional recovery strategy is more effective in restoring user trust than the affective recovery strategy and recovery satisfaction mediates the relationship between recovery strategies and post-trust. The findings also confirmed that functional repair is more effective than affective repair for accidental privacy violations, though the effectiveness of these two strategies for intentional privacy violations did not differ significantly. Research limitations/implications Companies should prioritize functional repair following privacy violations and strive to improve user satisfaction with recovery measures. Furthermore, they should choose recovery strategies based on the type of privacy violation to restore user trust. Originality/value This study is among the first to examine the relative effectiveness of functional and affective recovery strategies as privacy violation recovery actions. Moreover, this research applies attribution theory to the context of privacy violations and investigates the moderating role of privacy violation type.