(Un)divided work devotion? Navigating the ideal worker norm in academia
通过对92位博士的深度访谈，研究男女学者如何应对和重构学术界的理想工作者规范，分析工作与家庭及学术内部竞争需求的平衡策略，发现职位稳定性比性别或照顾责任更能影响学者选择。
Work devotion in academia is often described as a cultural mandate that defines work as a calling deserving of undivided allegiance. Critical perspectives point to how this ideal worker norm has gendered consequences and produces performance expectations that only a worker without care responsibilities can satisfy. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 92 PhD holders, this study examines the range of strategies women and men use to navigate and reframe the ideal worker norm in academia, analysing how they manage the competing demands of work and family, as well as the competing demands within academia. We extend existing research on academia by applying approaches that emphasise the benefits of multiple roles, showing how a divided work devotion with room for external responsibilities, expands academics’ frames of reference and provide alternative sources of meaning. However, our analysis shows how position, and whether one holds a temporary or permanent contract, is key to understand who can allow themselves to uphold a divided allegiance to academia. This study suggests that it is not gender or care responsibilities per se, but rather the intersection between these dimensions and positional power, that influence academics options for navigating the ideal worker norm.