Facilitators and barriers to implementing Hearing Conservation Programmes in industrial workplaces: a systematic review
系统综述了2000至2024年间工业场所实施听力保护计划的促进因素（如管理承诺、工人参与）和障碍（如培训不足、设备不适），发现因地制宜的设计和监管合规对成功实施至关重要。
Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains a serious occupational risk in industrial settings with constant high noise exposure. Although Hearing Conservation Programmes (HCPs) are widely implemented, their effectiveness is limited by funding shortages, poor training and low compliance. This systematic review examines factors that facilitate or hinder HCP implementation, variations in program outcomes and the influence of employee attitudes, behavior and regulatory compliance. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practices Project (EPHPP) tool, and risk of bias in non-randomized studies was evaluated with Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for English-language studies on industrial HCPs published between 2000 and 2024. Eligible designs included randomised or non-randomised trials, observational studies and mixed methods. Data extraction was guided by a standardised form capturing programme components such as training, monitoring, compliance strategies, participant characteristics and outcome indicators, which included hearing protection device usage, NIHL incidence and compliance.Nine studies from various industries met the criteria. Key facilitators included management commitment, worker involvement and tailored interventions that improved compliance and reduced NIHL. Common barriers were inconsistent training, discomfort with protective equipment and gaps between programme goals and workplace conditions. The findings also highlighted that consistent regulatory compliance and a supportive organisational culture play a critical role in the successful implementation of HCPs.Effective HCPs require context-specific designs addressing workplace barriers and enhancing facilitators. Future research should prioritise longitudinal studies to evaluate long-term sustainability and impact.