🌙

定性结果的因果推断

Causal inference for qualitative outcomes

Economics Letters · 2025
被引 0
人大 BABS 3

中文导读

指出工具变量等因果推断方法用于多分类或有序结果时存在根本性挑战,提出以概率转移作为有意义的因果估计量,并给出识别与估计策略,附有R软件包。

Abstract

Causal inference methods such as instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, and difference-in-differences are widely used to identify and estimate treatment effects. However, when outcomes are qualitative, their application poses fundamental challenges. This paper highlights these challenges and proposes an alternative framework that focuses on well-defined and interpretable estimands. We show that conventional identification assumptions suffice for identifying the new estimands and outline simple, intuitive estimation strategies that remain fully compatible with conventional econometric methods. We provide an accompanying open-source R package, causalQual , which is publicly available on CRAN. • Shows ATE is ill-defined for multinomial and ordinal outcomes. • Proposes Probability Shift as a meaningful causal estimand. • Establishes identification under standard research designs. • Demonstrates estimation with standard econometric tools. • Offers user-friendly R package for applied researchers.

因果推断计量经济学定性结果处理效应