CROSSROADS—Organization Research as an Applied Science: Lessons from Fields That Shape Practice and Policy
比较组织研究与健康科学、工程学等应用科学的出版系统，分析证据与理论平衡、研究类型多样性等四个要素，为提升组织研究的现实影响力提供路径。
Numerous calls over decades have urged scholars to pursue research that is more relevant to problems faced by organizations and their members. Yet the relevance and impact of our field remains limited compared with other applied sciences. Whereas individual aspects of our research practice, such as expectations about methods, theoretical novelty, and motivating a study, are frequently discussed in our field, less attention is paid to the publication system. Our perspective is that to bring about a field-wide change would require us to identify and address the systemic sources of the issue. Accordingly, we compare publication systems across applied sciences, contrasting organization research with those of impactful applied sciences, such as health sciences, engineering, economics, and design science. We focus on four fundamental elements of publication systems: balance between evidence and theory, diversity of research types accommodated, system responsiveness to real-world challenges, and relationship between exploration and replication. These elements are interdependent, and understanding them together reveals how publication systems can enable or constrain what gets published and its impact, enabling us to identify pathways to reorient publication systems in our field to become a more impactful applied science. History: This is the lead manuscript in the five-piece crossroads collection “Organization Research as an Applied Science,” edited by Gokhan Ertug and Stephen Zhang. The companion pieces are Croson and Croson (2025) , Eesley and Gerber (2025) , Berry (2025) , and Yoeli and Rand (2025) . Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.20459 .