“Nobody’s Children”: The Racial History of Parental Rights Law in Foster Care
本文追溯了寄养服务中母亲不称职的种族逻辑如何形成并影响亲权，揭示了“不感兴趣的母亲”这一种族神话的起源，以及它如何推动寄养从福利服务转向强制制度。
While scholars show that child protection is tied to the regulation of motherhood, we know little about how mothers of color were treated in early child welfare history. To address this gap, this article traces how racial logics of maternal unfitness emerged in foster care services and shaped parental rights. Using case files and archival documents from New York child welfare agencies, this study establishes the racial myth of the “uninterested mother,” describing a perceived crisis of child abandonment in foster care. This myth emerged as a growing psychologization of motherhood converged with the realities of urban poverty that drove mothers of color to foster their children. At a time when struggling parents willingly chose foster placement, I show that welfare authorities began to limit foster care use and enforce women’s obligation to care for their children. In the late 1950s, reformers passed the “permanent neglect” statute to discourage the abandonment of children in foster care, and in doing so, reframed this service as temporary, punitive, and involuntary. The “uninterested mother” is an important racial myth about gender dependency in child welfare that offers new insight into the system’s shift from a welfare service to an authoritative one.