为什么我无法解决这个问题?有照顾责任的女性在高等教育决策中的身份协商

Why Can't I Figure This Out? Identity Negotiation and Higher Education Decision Making Among Women With Caring Responsibilities

Gender, Work and Organization · 2026
被引 1 · 同刊同年前 2%
ABS 3

中文导读

研究通过访谈15名澳大利亚女性照顾者,运用Archer的反思性理论,揭示了照顾责任如何影响高等教育决策过程,为政策制定者和职业顾问提供支持。

Abstract

ABSTRACT Women with unpaid caring responsibilities frequently wrestle with challenges when making decisions about higher education study, asking “Why can't I figure this out?” Statistics have persistently demonstrated that women undertake the majority of unpaid care work, however, unpaid carers are an underrepresented cohort in research, in higher education policy, and in widening participation initiatives. Higher education (HE) is an avenue for establishing a vocational identity, for career development and fulfilling life goals, yet female carers frequently encounter barriers and challenges when making decisions about higher education study. With little research available to equip HE institutions and career counselors to respond, Margaret Archer's Theory of Reflexivity and “DDD scheme,” Discernment, Deliberation, Dedication was used to investigate the social problem of how care responsibilities shape women's higher education decision‐making processes. This study examined the reflexive deliberation processes of unpaid carers through interviews with 15 Australian women who were considering HE enrollment. Each participant engaged in three in‐depth semi‐structured interviews incorporating a range of qualitative tools over a 6‐month period, resulting in a total of 45 interviews. Thematic analysis made visible the array of mental activities involved in the reflexive HE decision making processes undertaken by carers, revealing the often hidden personal, cultural and structural conditions that shape educational trajectories. This study offers insights for academic researchers, career counselors, policymakers and HE professional worldwide who seek to support carers' decision‐making processes, ultimately advancing widening participation agendas.

高等教育女性研究职业决策质性研究