隐藏的艰辛:英国农村的日常经历、应对策略与福祉障碍

Hidden hardship: everyday experiences, coping strategies, and barriers to wellbeing in rural britain

Journal of Rural Studies · 2026
被引 0
ABS 3

中文导读

通过参与式研究,探讨英国科茨沃尔德地区农村贫困人群的日常艰辛、应对策略及改善福祉的障碍,提出“艰辛”概念比“贫困”更全面且去污名化。

Abstract

Poverty in the UK is more often associated in public discourse, the media, and in policy with urban than rural areas. With the exception of notable pieces in rural geographies, research across the social sciences has also focussed more on urban than rural poverty. This is mistaken: rural poverty is a significant problem too. This paper focusses on rural hardship in the Cotswolds in the UK which is an area associated with affluence, super-rich celebrities, and royalty. Through participatory research, this paper seeks to understand how people in the North Cotswolds experience hardship, their coping strategies, and the barriers to improved wellbeing. It argues that the North Cotswolds is an area of hidden hardship which means that the rural idyll needs challenging further in public and policy discourse, which research such as this can play a role in. In doing so, this paper's primary contribution is to have developed the conceptual language of hardship. This is significant for three main reasons. First, the paper argues that the language of hardship is more accessible methodologically, and secondly, that hardship can be a more encapsulating, holistic and multidimensional term than poverty. Thirdly, by using the theoretical lens of the philosopher Spinoza and his concepts of affect, affective capacity and conatus, the paper develops an original way of understanding hardship that results in the paper putting forward a definition of hardship as being about both struggle and resilience on an ongoing daily basis rather than about an emergency one-off situation. • This paper develops the conceptual language of hardship over poverty. • Hardship can be a more encapsulating, holistic and multidimensional term. • Spinoza's affective capacity and conatus shows struggle and resilience in hardship. • Hardship language can be less stigmatising than poverty in participatory research. • Rural hardship exists in areas of rural affluence.

农村贫困福祉应对策略公共政策社会心理学