Antidote for the personalization-privacy paradox: Does algorithm transparency trigger higher ad click-through intention than algorithm literacy?
通过在线实验发现，算法透明度比算法素养更能缓解个性化广告引发的隐私担忧，提高点击意愿，为平台和政策制定者提供了操作策略而非监管思路。
Purpose This study investigates whether the personalization–privacy paradox can be resolved under conditions not previously explored: algorithm transparency (AGT) and algorithm literacy (AGL). Design/methodology/approach An online experiment was conducted, and a moderated-moderated mediation model was assessed. Findings AGL reduced privacy concerns for highly personalized advertising, with literate consumers perceiving lower risks and showing higher click intention when algorithms were transparent. AGT proved more effective than literacy in resolving the personalization-privacy paradox. Research limitations/implications This study extends privacy paradox research by identifying how algorithm-related variables (transparency and literacy) moderate the relationship between personalization level and privacy concerns through risk perception. The findings suggest new research directions examining how varying personalization levels interact with algorithmic factors influencing consumer behavior. Practical implications Online platforms need to effectively communicate their algorithmic processes by explaining both technical operations and potential consequences of data usage. Rather than imposing penalties to reduce personalization levels, policymakers should promote AGT and enhance consumer education to help users make informed decisions about personalized advertising. Originality/value This study highlights the importance of exploring the black box of algorithms. For academia, this study expands previous findings by presenting algorithm-related conditions that serve as potential boundary conditions to resolve the personalization-privacy paradox. For the advertising industry, this study offers practitioners and policymakers insights into algorithm operation strategies rather than regulations.