A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare
研究开发了机器学习模型Franklin，利用Medicare索赔数据预测年度费用，相比现有HCC模型显著提高了风险调整准确性，尤其改善了少数族裔和农村居民的预测精度，但需关注其公平性影响。
ABSTRACT Objective To develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm that improves accuracy compared to the Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) score used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to risk‐adjust payments for > 65 million Americans. Study Design and Setting Prognostic study using Medicare claims data to train “Franklin”, an ML algorithm predicting one‐year costs, trained using identical data to HCC. Predictive accuracy was evaluated using R 2 log cost, Spearman rho, and sensitivity and specificity. Data Sources and Analytic Sample Random sample of 2018–2019 Part A and B claims from aged, community‐based enrollees in Traditional Medicare who were not dually eligible and did not have end‐stage renal disease. Principal Findings The sample consisted of 4,176,666 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age 74.9 [7.2] years, 55.9% women; 85.9% Non‐Hispanic white, 5.6% African‐American, 3.4% Hispanic). Franklin was more accurate than HCC ( R 2 log cost 0.44 vs. 0.15; Spearman rho 0.61 vs. 0.41, p < 0.001 for both). Accuracy improved for the 47% of beneficiaries with 0 HCCs and the 27% of beneficiaries with one HCC (Spearman rho 0.59 vs. 0.08 and 0.46 vs. 0.16, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Franklin outperformed HCC in detecting the 20% lowest‐cost beneficiaries (sensitivity 0.60 vs. 0.34, specificity 0.90 vs. 0.83; p < 0.001 for both). Franklin improved accuracy over HCC for racial/ethnic minorities and rural‐dwelling beneficiaries ( R 2 log cost Black 0.48 vs. 0.14, Hispanic 0.55 vs. 0.09, rural 0.36 v. 0.11; p < 0.001 for all), although Franklin disproportionately classified Black (15.8% vs. 10.1%) and Hispanic (22.9% vs. 12.2%) beneficiaries in the lowest predicted cost decile. Conclusions Franklin is an ML risk adjustment model that significantly improves risk‐adjustment accuracy for Medicare beneficiaries compared to HCC. Franklin could generate improvement in payment accuracy, reduction in selection incentives, and financial savings to Medicare. Clarifying the equity impacts of more accurate risk adjustment is necessary.