Chronic Absence as a Public Health Priority: A Framework for Coordinated Action
本文提出将长期缺勤重新定义为公共卫生问题，而非仅教育问题，并构建跨部门协调行动框架，强调需从健康、住房等根本原因入手，对政策制定者和教育工作者有参考价值。
Policy Points Chronic absence should be recognized as a public health indicator and early warning sign that systems are failing to meet the developmental, social, and health needs of students. Improving student attendance requires cross-sector policy action across education, health, and public health to address the structural and social determinants of chronic absence. A prevention-oriented public health approach is essential, focusing on root causes that schools cannot address alone such as poor health, housing instability, and unreliable transportation. CONTEXT: Chronic absence, defined as missing more than 10% of time in school, has risen sharply in the United States following the COVID-19 pandemic and now affects more than one in four students. It reflects unmet health and social needs and is patterned by deep structural inequalities. Both short- and long-term consequences include adverse impacts on educational attainment, health, and social outcomes. Despite this, chronic absence remains largely framed and addressed as an education-sector problem, limiting the scope and effectiveness of current responses. METHODS: This perspective synthesizes interdisciplinary evidence from education, public health, and child development literature, drawing on ecological and life course frameworks to reconceptualize chronic absence as a public health issue. We develop a conceptual model integrating multilevel determinants of attendance across individual, family, school, community, and structural domains, and identify implications for policy and cross-sector action. FINDINGS: Viewing chronic absence through a public health lens reframes it from a purely educational outcome to a signal of unmet need and a multidimensional indicator of system performance. Attendance patterns reflect the interaction of health, social, and structural factors that lie largely outside of the control of schools. Current approaches often emphasize individual responsibility, while overlooking the broader conditions that shape attendance. Reframing chronic absence in this way underscores the need for coordinated cross-sector interventions that address underlying determinants. CONCLUSIONS: Positioning chronic absence as a public health priority enables a more coherent response. We propose three principles to guide action: (1) use school attendance data as a vital sign of student and system well-being; (2) develop strategic partnerships to align goals and drive progress; and (3) develop strengths-based policies and programs to prevent chronic absence. Without this shift, efforts to reduce chronic absence are likely to remain fragmented and insufficient to achieve equitable improvements in child health and educational outcomes.