Recreational Land Use as a Basis for Adverse Possession
指出，美国各州关于逆权侵占的法律偏向于消耗性土地利用，而忽视了娱乐性等非消耗性用途，呼吁法律改革以支持栖息地改善和娱乐活动。
garded as valuable and warranted at the time (Wilkinson 1992; Stevens 1996). Although new scarcities and priorities are leading to revisions in state laws regarding instream flows, statutory remedies alone can put precious little water back in Western streams (McDonnell and Rice 1993). I will make a related argument here: that historical bias has also worked against land-based habitat enhancement and recreation. In particular, state laws relating to adverse possession of land still favor extractive uses over nonconsumptive uses.